du redest über die demokraten als ob sie eine homogene masse wären
die sind in sich fast genau so gespalten wie die usa insgesamt
die sind in sich fast genau so gespalten wie die usa insgesamt
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Seite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Weitere Informationen
'Maturity,' father had slowly begun,' Is knowing you're wrong and accepting it, son. There's prudence in pausing with patience and joy - And hearing the wisdom in others, my boy. 'A person's perspective,' he said with a smile, 'Is plain if you walk in their shoes for a while. | And if you can do it - if maybe you do - You might understand, and agree that it's true.' I followed his reasons, and nodded, polite; Perhaps that was logic - perhaps he was right. Perhaps there was truth in his claim all along... 'I'm twenty,' I countered: 'I'm right, and you're wrong.' |
Crytash schrieb:
Und um ehrlich zu sein, sah es weit schlimmer unter Bill Clinton aus, als jetzt für Trump.
Crytash schrieb:
blutgarten schrieb:
Also wenn man einen Tag nachdem ein 400-Seiten Bericht veröffentlicht wird meint zu wissen was daraus hervorgehen wird, dann sollte man sich in der Tat überlegen inwieweit man sich hat hinreißen lassen.
Die Frage, ob sich Trump und der Kreml abgesprochen hatten, war wohl die größte und wichtigste Frage, die der Bericht zu beantworten hatte und wie man sieht, ist lautet die Antwort Nein. Eine der anderen Fragen, nämlich ob es zu einer Behinderung des Verfahrens kam, ist (leider) eher unbedeutend für die politische Realität.Wenn man sich mal anhört, was Pelosi zum Thema Amtsenthebung wegen Behinderung der Ermittlungen sagt, wird einem auch klar, dass sie und die demokratische Führung nicht bereit sind, Schritte in dieser Richtung einzuleiten.Müller Bericht schrieb:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO VOLUME I
(...)
RUSSIAN CONTACTS WITH THE CAMPAIGN
(...)
Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
Dies sollte auch Keinen überraschen, der sich eingehend mit der Lage der demokratischen Partei in den USA beschäftigt. Die Kavanaugh Anhörungen hatten ihnen etwas geschadet und die Demokraten wollen diesen Fehler nicht zweimal in einer Legislaturperiode machen.
Wer den Mueller-Bericht unvoreingenommen und ohne Parteibuch liest, kann kaum zu einem anderen Schluss kommen: Wenn die mächtigste Demokratie der Welt derart von innen untergraben wird, ist diese Demokratie in Gefahr.
The Intercept schrieb:
“Now that we have seen almost the entire report of more than 400 pages, we know Barr intentionally misled the American people about Mueller’s findings and his legal reasoning,” wrote Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor and Politico columnist who unsuccessfully ran last year as a Democrat to be Illinois attorney general. “Mueller’s report detailed extraordinary efforts by Trump to abuse his power as president to undermine Mueller’s investigation,” Mariotti added. “The case is so detailed that it is hard to escape the conclusion that Mueller could have indicted and convicted Trump for obstruction of justice—if he were permitted to do so. And the reason he is not permitted to do so is very clear: Department of Justice policy prohibits the indictment of a sitting president.”
Alex- schrieb:
Calle mal weniger als 5%
black_head schrieb:
Und politischer realtalk: je länger die Demokraten auf dem Muller Report rumreiten, desto deutlicher wird Trumps Wiederwahl
When asked if the report’s release changed their minds about the Trump administration, 70 percent said "no." Of those who said "yes," 68 percent indicated they were now “more likely to believe that President Trump or someone close to him broke the law.” That’s a significant jump from the 49 percent of respondents who answered similarly in March.
boobold schrieb:
Heftiger Realtalk. Bitte keine random Talking Points ohne Fact Check wiederkauen, danke.black_head schrieb:
Und politischer realtalk: je länger die Demokraten auf dem Muller Report rumreiten, desto deutlicher wird Trumps Wiederwahl
Trump approval rating drops to lowest level of the year following release of the Mueller report.
When asked if the report’s release changed their minds about the Trump administration, 70 percent said "no." Of those who said "yes," 68 percent indicated they were now “more likely to believe that President Trump or someone close to him broke the law.” That’s a significant jump from the 49 percent of respondents who answered similarly in March.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von black_head ()
boobold schrieb:
Heftiger Realtalk. Bitte keine random Talking Points ohne Fact Check wiederkauen, danke.black_head schrieb:
Und politischer realtalk: je länger die Demokraten auf dem Muller Report rumreiten, desto deutlicher wird Trumps Wiederwahl
Trump approval rating drops to lowest level of the year following release of the Mueller report.
When asked if the report’s release changed their minds about the Trump administration, 70 percent said "no." Of those who said "yes," 68 percent indicated they were now “more likely to believe that President Trump or someone close to him broke the law.” That’s a significant jump from the 49 percent of respondents who answered similarly in March.
'Maturity,' father had slowly begun,' Is knowing you're wrong and accepting it, son. There's prudence in pausing with patience and joy - And hearing the wisdom in others, my boy. 'A person's perspective,' he said with a smile, 'Is plain if you walk in their shoes for a while. | And if you can do it - if maybe you do - You might understand, and agree that it's true.' I followed his reasons, and nodded, polite; Perhaps that was logic - perhaps he was right. Perhaps there was truth in his claim all along... 'I'm twenty,' I countered: 'I'm right, and you're wrong.' |
Washington Post schrieb:
“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”
TLDR: Mueller hat von vorneherin eine Version des Berichts vorgesehen, die direkt veröffentlicht werden kann. Stattdessen veröffentlicht Barr seine eigene Zusammenfassung, die die Erkenntnisse des Berichts aus dem Kontext zieht und für öffentliche Verwirrung sorgt. Zufälligerweise kann der Präsident das dann ausnutzen um seine Basis davon zu überzeugen, dass er entlastet wurde und selbst im fernen Deutschland gibt es einige die das dann auch noch glauben. Wer hätte das nur ahnen können.Robert Mueller schrieb:
Dear Attorney General Barr:
I previously sent you a letter dated March 25, 2019, that enclosed
the introduction and executive summary for each volume of the Special
Counsel’s report marked with redactions to remove any information that
potentially could be protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure
6(e); that concerned declination decisions; or that related to a charged
case. We also had marked an additional two sentences for review and
have now confirmed that these sentences can be released publicly.
Accordingly, the enclosed documents are in a form that can be
released to the public consistent with legal requirements and Department
policies. I am requesting that you provide these materials to Congress
and authorize their public release at this time.
As we stated in our meeting of March 5 and reiterated to the
Department early in the afternoon of March 24, the introductions and
executive summaries of our two-volume report accurately summarize this
Office’s work and conclusions. The summary letter the Department sent to
Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this
Office’s work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the
Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion
about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This
threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department
appointed the Special Counsel; to assure full public confidence in the
outcome of the investigations. See Department of Justice, Press Release (May 17, 2017).
While we understand that the Department is reviewing the full report
to determine what is appropriate for public release—a process that our
Office is working with you to complete—that process need not delay
release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate
the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional
and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.
It would also accord with the standard for public release of
notifications to Congress cited in your letter. See 28 C.F.R. §
609(c) (“the Attorney General may determine that public release” of
confressional notifications “would be in the public interest”).
Sincerely yours,
Robert S. Mueller, III
Special Counsel
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von langbutter ()
20 Besucher