The Intercept schrieb:

“Now that we have seen almost the entire report of more than 400 pages, we know Barr intentionally misled the American people about Mueller’s findings and his legal reasoning,” wrote Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor and Politico columnist who unsuccessfully ran last year as a Democrat to be Illinois attorney general. “Mueller’s report detailed extraordinary efforts by Trump to abuse his power as president to undermine Mueller’s investigation,” Mariotti added. “The case is so detailed that it is hard to escape the conclusion that Mueller could have indicted and convicted Trump for obstruction of justice—if he were permitted to do so. And the reason he is not permitted to do so is very clear: Department of Justice policy prohibits the indictment of a sitting president.”

Washington Post schrieb:

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

Robert Mueller schrieb:

Dear Attorney General Barr:

I previously sent you a letter dated March 25, 2019, that enclosed
the introduction and executive summary for each volume of the Special
Counsel’s report marked with redactions to remove any information that
potentially could be protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure
6(e); that concerned declination decisions; or that related to a charged
case. We also had marked an additional two sentences for review and
have now confirmed that these sentences can be released publicly.

Accordingly, the enclosed documents are in a form that can be
released to the public consistent with legal requirements and Department
policies. I am requesting that you provide these materials to Congress
and authorize their public release at this time.

As we stated in our meeting of March 5 and reiterated to the
Department early in the afternoon of March 24, the introductions and
executive summaries of our two-volume report accurately summarize this
Office’s work and conclusions. The summary letter the Department sent to
Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this
Office’s work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the
Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion
about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This
threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department
appointed the Special Counsel; to assure full public confidence in the
outcome of the investigations. See Department of Justice, Press Release (May 17, 2017).

While we understand that the Department is reviewing the full report
to determine what is appropriate for public release—a process that our
Office is working with you to complete—that process need not delay
release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate
the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional
and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.
It would also accord with the standard for public release of
notifications to Congress cited in your letter. See 28 C.F.R. §
609(c) (“the Attorney General may determine that public release” of
confressional notifications “would be in the public interest”).

Sincerely yours,
Robert S. Mueller, III
Special Counsel