Crytash schrieb:
Clinton würde gegen viele andere halbwegs normale Kandidaten verlieren.
watnuss schrieb:
Ich bin immer noch traurig, dass es nicht Sanders geworden ist. Ich denke der hätte alles andere in den primaries überfahren.
Wie ist das eigentlich, wenn Hilary gewinnt. Ist sie dann bei der nächsten Wahl automatisch die Kandidatin der Democrats oder könnte es da auch nen neuen Kandidaten geben?
| 'Maturity,' father had slowly begun,' Is knowing you're wrong and accepting it, son. There's prudence in pausing with patience and joy - And hearing the wisdom in others, my boy. 'A person's perspective,' he said with a smile, 'Is plain if you walk in their shoes for a while. | And if you can do it - if maybe you do - You might understand, and agree that it's true.' I followed his reasons, and nodded, polite; Perhaps that was logic - perhaps he was right. Perhaps there was truth in his claim all along... 'I'm twenty,' I countered: 'I'm right, and you're wrong.' |
watnuss schrieb:
Ich bin immer noch traurig, dass es nicht Sanders geworden ist. Ich denke der hätte alles andere in den primaries überfahren.
Wie ist das eigentlich, wenn Hilary gewinnt. Ist sie dann bei der nächsten Wahl automatisch die Kandidatin der Democrats oder könnte es da auch nen neuen Kandidaten geben?
HumanlyPuma schrieb:
junge leg dir ne hantel ins büro oder geh kegeln
Kyuzo schrieb:
Er ist halt ein fucking commie mit seinen Ideen für Sozialleistungen.
Oster schrieb:
Wenigstens shrodo denkt mit.
jenes.wolliver twist schrieb:
Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland (vor Agenda 2010)=Kommunismus in den USA
| 'Maturity,' father had slowly begun,' Is knowing you're wrong and accepting it, son. There's prudence in pausing with patience and joy - And hearing the wisdom in others, my boy. 'A person's perspective,' he said with a smile, 'Is plain if you walk in their shoes for a while. | And if you can do it - if maybe you do - You might understand, and agree that it's true.' I followed his reasons, and nodded, polite; Perhaps that was logic - perhaps he was right. Perhaps there was truth in his claim all along... 'I'm twenty,' I countered: 'I'm right, and you're wrong.' |
Some conservatives tried to fight back against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational point of view, but their arguments seemed to go unheard.
One of the chief problems, Sykes said, was that it had become impossible to prove to listeners that Trump was telling falsehoods because over the past several decades, the conservative news media had "basically eliminated any of the referees, the gatekeepers."
"There's nobody," he lamented. "Let's say that Donald Trump basically makes whatever you want to say, whatever claim he wants to make. And everybody knows it's a falsehood. The big question of my audience, it is impossible for me to say that, 'By the way, you know it's false.' And they'll say, 'Why? I saw it on Allen B. West.' Or they'll say, 'I saw it on a Facebook page.' And I'll say, 'The New York Times did a fact check.' And they'll say, 'Oh, that's The New York Times. That's bulls---.' There's nobody — you can't go to anybody and say, 'Look, here are the facts.'"
"And I have to say that's one of the disorienting realities of this political year. You can be in this alternative media reality and there's no way to break through it," Sykes continued. "And I swim upstream because if I don't say these things from some of these websites, then suddenly I have sold out. Then they'll ask what's wrong with me for not repeating these stories that I know not to be true."
13 Besucher
